Here's the video, linked in a chopped-up form from YouTube for reasons I'll talk about in a second. Cho looks down at his feet and mumbles in monotone.
"I had to... You had a hundred billion chances to avoid today, but you decided to spill my blood, etc."
You know the quotes by now. But take away everything you know about this story and imagine someone just sent you this video of a kid ranting like this and pointing firearms at a camera while looking tough. He comes off like any other idiot on the Internet; parading his darkness around for everyone to see, proudly reciting practiced and embarrassing speeches, and posing daringly.
So, naturally people need to get worked into a tizzy over NBC's decision to air the footage. And just like every time the news confronts you with something you don't want to see, it's time to get righteously indignant. It's time for a good ol' fashioned media spankin'! Immediately, news organizations begin censoring themselves.
NEW YORK - With a backlash developing against the news media for airing sickening photos from Virginia Tech shooter Cho Seung-Hui, Fox News Channel said Thursday it would stop showing them and other networks said they would severely limit their use.
Well, the video was shocking to the families of the victims, to be sure. But how much worse can it be from the full-steam-ahead nonstop, no-end-in-sight coverage the media outlets have been using since Monday? And to be fair, Brian Jennings prefaced the footage with about 3 excruciating minutes of buildup and explanation. Anyone who had any problems with the video had oodles of time to get up from their chair, rip up the couch cushions to look for the remote to turn the volume down, head for the door, trip over the cat on the way out, fix the crooked picture of grandma hanging on the wall, scratch their nose and head for the kitchen for a snack before Cho's face popped up once in the coverage.
The police, ever the shining moral compass for the rest of the nation, said they were disappointed in the airing of the footage. I'd have a snarky comment about that, but getting pooh-poohed by a cop is like getting let off with a warning instead of a speeding ticket.
NBC defended its use of the video and they're the ones coming out on top of this whole mess. They had their scoop over everyone else and now other major news organizations are too limp-wristed to use the video themselves.
The gains of sensationalism aside, you can't let something like this go. As a reporter it's your job to fill in the public with as many details as you can. The first and biggest question out of everyone's mouth after something like this is "Why?" So "why" not give the killer a chance to speak for himself?
It's not like this is the first video of a school shooting the media ever ran. Recognize this? And in an era of Myspace where cameras are cheap and your personal dignity is easier than ever to sell out, Cho's videotaped rant is a historic moment where everyone with access to a computer can get inside the head of a lunatic.
People want to hear what he has to say. People *want* to see that tape. As much as they don't like to admit it, people want to look when they see a car accident on the side of the road.
Psychologists had this to say about the tape. I don't want to concede that they have a point, because I don't know if they do. I feel funny when people in suits tell me that the public should be protected from some kinds of speech, especially when its as ridiculous and bumbling as Cho's.
April 20 (4-20, geddit?) marks the 8th Anniversary of the Columbine Massacre. Marilyn Manson, gave several brilliant interviews as everyone was busy trying to stick his head on a pike as a warning other rock artists. Today, as reports try to turn this into Columbine 2.0 (remember the Natural Born Killers?) I think it might be worthwhile to link Manson's interview with Michael Moore. Manson said he would have listened to the killers. I don't think this would work in Cho's case, as Cho didn't really like to talk that much.